Tag: Performance calibration Toolkit

How HR Helps Performance Review Calibration and Standardization

Performance review calibration is a workplace mechanism involving a formal discussion of proposed employee ratings among managers. The goal is to conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation of an employee, ascertaining their future, promotion, appraisals, etc., in the company.

Performance review calibration serves as a powerful tool in ensuring a uniform set of guidelines for assessing the performance of all employees. These calibrations also assist leaders in supporting one another and collaborating on the standards that should be set for team members at all levels of the organization. This helps managers draft employee expectations while determining the best way to conduct performance reviews. This practice removes the bias in the performance review process and ensures managers agree on the performance criteria against which their reports will be rated.

This article outlines the performance review calibration process, its significance, and some best practices.

What Is Calibration in Performance Reviews?

Performance review calibration (or performance management calibration) enables managers in an organization to maintain similar standards in each of their direct reports. This ensures everyone in the department is ranked on the same scale. The department, employee level, or job role can gauge and decide calibrations.

A firm should perform performance review calibrations before each significant review cycle. However, they may also be carried out if departments merge or organizations go through a management transition.

Also read: Introducing A Performance Management Tool In Your Organization

The Role of HR in Performance Calibration

Role of HR in performance calibration

HR professionals play a pivotal role in successful calibration sessions. They act as neutral facilitators, mitigating bias, conflict, and meeting fatigue. HR professionals must define clear behavioral expectations from participants, introduce data, and manage group size and agendas. 

Ensuring Consistency

As a neutral facilitator, an HR should ensure fairness, objectivity, and consistency during calibration and standardization sessions of performance reviews. In addition to defining and upholding the criteria used to evaluate personnel, HR also assists managers in this process.

Aligning Employee-Employer Goals

HR professionals collaborate with managers to identify key performance indicators to evaluate an employee’s performance. They also set defined and objective performance criteria that align with the company’s vision and values.

Maintaining Review Cycles

Performance review cycles - performance calibration

HR is responsible for holding performance review calibration meetings after every review cycle. These review cycles may be annual, biannual, or more regular, depending on how a business is set up. The important thing is to keep the performance review calibration process consistent. A Betterworks survey reveals that 66% of companies implementing a continuous performance management system witnessed enhanced productivity.

Training Managers

HR provides necessary training to managers to understand effective evaluation techniques. The training equips managers with the skills to conduct fair assessments. HR educates managers about various aspects of performance evaluations. These aspects could be giving constructive feedback, counseling on performance issues, and deciding corrective actions while maintaining a supportive environment for growth.

Tracking Standardization

Furthermore, HR needs to monitor and keep track of the performance review process’s overall efficacy. It is their role to examine data gathered from evaluations to spot trends and potential improvement areas. The data lets them choose talent management methods like promotions, career advancement opportunities, or corrective measures.

An HR must compile aggregate and historical data for the business, including average ratings across critical factors, performance distributions, and the identification of outliers. Human Resources professionals’ involvement in performance review calibration and standardization is paramount for fostering transparency in the workplace while boosting trust and employee morale.

By setting clear evaluation standards, facilitating calibration sessions, educating managers regarding the process, and analyzing evaluation data – HR contributes significantly towards enhancing employee engagement and cultivating a culture of continuous improvement within organizations. 

Steps Involved in Calibration of Performance Reviews

Steps Involved in Calibration of Performance Reviews

Calibrating and standardizing performance reviews are essential in keeping the review process unbiased and accurate. An organization’s HR drives the calibration process, including building capability models and facilitating manager calibration discussions. To effectively calibrate and standardize performance reviews, HR must follow these five steps:

Define Specific Criteria

Managers and supervisors should meet with executives and HR to review the goals, the evaluation process, and the standards for good performance ratings. Performance standards should support organizational objectives and offer a framework for evaluating many facets of job performance.

Train Managers

Managers need to be educated about effective techniques for performance evaluations. This includes training managers about the importance of calibration and guiding how to assess employees consistently using the established criteria.

A survey by Gartner found that 47% of HR leaders cannot identify employee skill gaps and training needs. Hence, HR should identify the training requirements for managers and accordingly use the latest methods and friendly technology to provide training.

Also read: Performance Appraisal Checklist for Managers and Employees

Conduct Calibration Meetings

HR representatives and senior management discuss employee appraisals. To ensure managers evaluate employees according to the same criteria, the group reviews the performance reports and employee ratings. Certain managers may rate employees as top performers, while others may rate the same employees as average performers.

Discussions are held to verify that ratings are issued properly and consistently and to modify individual ratings to conform to criteria. Consider using organizational charts for an easy-to-read overview of the employees.

Also read: Performance Calibration Meetings: Everything You Need To Know

Encourage Ongoing Feedback

Managers should understand the importance of continuous feedback. Regular feedback throughout the year, rather than waiting until the formal review period, helps ensure employees clearly understand their strengths and areas for improvement. Additionally, managers should be able to justify their ratings and comments and offer corrective actions and next steps for each employee.

Employee recognition statistics show that 85% of surveyed professionals feel weekly check-ins with their manager(s) increase employee engagement compared to their counterparts with annual reviews.

Communicate Feedback

Once necessary adjustments and decisions have been made, managers can communicate and discuss their performance reviews with employees. Managers should support their reviews with corrective action or a professional development plan for the employee. A study found that 86% of employees feel they would quit their current jobs in case of no opportunities for professional development.

Importance of Performance Reviews Calibration Process

Importance of Performance Reviews Calibration Process

Data by Gallup reveals that focusing on a robust performance management system has lowered turnover rates by 14.9%. Performance review calibration and standardization benefit organizations of all sizes. Businesses can guarantee a fair, accurate, and reliable performance evaluation by implementing a robust calibration mechanism.

Fair Ratings

One of the primary benefits of holding calibration sessions is that they promote fairness throughout the organization. When managers calibrate performance reviews, they compare ratings across different verticals or departments to ensure consistency. This eliminates any potential risk of favoritism that may exist.

For example, a lenient manager may rate all his employees 5/5, while a stricter manager may rate employees with similar performance standards a 3/5. The performance review calibration process aims to mitigate such discrepancies.

Also read: 9 Ways To Tackle Unconscious Bias At Work

Employee Engagement

Another benefit of calibration is its ability to propel employee engagement and development. With standardized performance reviews, employees gain insight into their strengths and areas for improvement. This enables them to understand where they stand regarding company expectations and provides a roadmap for career growth and advancement.

Also read: Best Employee Engagement Strategies for Better Workplace

Enhanced Communication

Calibration meetings are crucial in fostering open communication between managers and employees. This transparent communication is important for any business to have its employees aligned with the organization’s goals.

Calibration sessions involve open dialogue between multiple stakeholders from various levels within the organization and cultivate a culture of collaboration and shared understanding among team members.

Better Decision-Making

Additionally, calibrated performance assessments provide organizations with useful information for making informed talent management decisions, including succession planning and promotions.

By prioritizing and implementing efficient performance review calibration and standardization processes, companies foster an inclusive work environment based on meritocracy. Investing in robust performance management software is a great way to strengthen an organization’s overall performance management system.

Also read: 5 Reasons To Start Using An HR Management Software For Your Business!

Summing Up

Equitable performance evaluations are only possible with performance management calibrations. When conducted properly, performance reviews inspire workers, foster learning via constructive feedback, and provide businesses insight into employee performance.

For every business, getting the performance appraisal cycle right is important. Engagedly provides new-age performance management software to align people’s practices with organizational strategy. Our all-in-one performance management system helps you get performance review calibrations right the first time by combining the tools, workflows, and insights to develop engaged and high-performing employees within a winning culture.

Performance Reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What do the 3 R’s of performance management refer to?

Ans. The three R’s of performance management are rewards, retention, and remuneration.

Q2. What is the difference between KPIs and KRAs?

Ans. KRAs (or Key Responsibility Areas) refer to a set of responsibilities attached to a job profile. KPIs (or Key Performance Areas) are the metrics used to measure the level of accomplishment of KRAs.

Q3. Can managers have their rating scale for appraising an employee’s performance?

Ans. No, the rating scale must be the same across all the organization’s departments. Managers cannot develop an additional rating scale.

Subscribe To The Engagedly Newsletter


Performance Calibration Meetings: Everything You Need To Know

A company’s performance management process should provide every employee with an equal opportunity to excel by offering valuable feedback on their performance. However, when an employee’s performance review is primarily determined by a manager during performance management processes, it can inadvertently introduce bias into reviews, favoring certain employees and placing others at a disadvantage.

To address and eliminate unintentional bias, one effective methodology to adopt is the performance calibration meeting. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of performance review calibration, exploring the concept in detail and unpacking the following:

What is a Performance Calibration Meeting?

A performance review calibration meeting is a process in which managers discuss the ratings of their direct reports with other managers. The purpose of these calibrations is to make employee evaluations more consistent throughout the organization.

By using this procedure, managers can reduce bias in the performance review process and ensure employees’ performance reports are created according to a common set of performance calibration criteria.

Ideally, all managers discuss their ratings before sharing their performance reviews with employees, so they can make any adjustments if necessary. Thus, performance calibration can help managers to ensure that they apply the same standards to all employees and objectively evaluate employees on uniform parameters.

Importance of Calibration Meeting

So far, we have understood that calibration meetings are conducted by managers to set standards for reviewing their employees, create a process to differentiate top performers and review employee ratings proposed by managers.

Employees highly value fairness. In one study, 85 percent of employees felt their performance review was unfair and hence, considered quitting their jobs!

Let us take an example to understand the importance of performance calibration ratings. Some managers are inclined to give all their employees a rating of 5 since they did everything in their job description. Alternatively, a stricter manager might give their top performers a rating of 3 if they meet the same performance criteria. The strict manager may come up with a reason such as the top performers only managed to meet the set requirements for their role, not exceed them.

In other words, managers likely want a fair review process, but they can miss the mark if their review process isn’t compared with others.

The more vagueness there is in the performance review process, the greater is the chance for bias and inaccurate feedback. The process of performance calibration ratings is a great way to remove any form of ambiguity. Thus, a company should prioritize performance calibration meetings since they can help to ensure that review standards are fair, equitable, and balanced across an organization.

Talent calibration meetings also allow managers to identify top performers throughout their organizations and honor these standout employees.

In addition to providing employees with a learning opportunity, these meetings also assist managers in improving their ability to observe employee performance and set performance standards. By having checkpoints before sharing performance reviews with employees, self-doubting managers will gain confidence in their reviews.

Also read: Re-evaluate Your Performance Management Practices

Who Should Participate in Performance Calibration Meetings?

Your organization’s size and structure will determine who will be part of the performance calibration meeting.

Performance appraisal meetings generally involve managers who will complete the performance appraisals along with HR personnel. The HR professionals would provide guidance wherever required. Additionally, having a representative from each department can help oversee the process.

In larger companies, involving all managers together at the same time may not be possible. In such situations, it is best to create subgroups within your company so meetings can be managed efficiently, without any form of chaos.

Preparing for Performance Calibration Meeting

A manager or supervisor should prepare performance review appraisals in advance and submit their drafts to senior leaders and/or HR leadership for review. At performance calibration meetings, they should be prepared to get their ratings reviewed or discussed with their peers and managers.

HR facilitators must facilitate the compilation of essential and historical data for the business. This data would include average ratings based on key factors; trends in performance, and the identification of exceptional performers. 

Step-wise Procedure to Calibrate Performance Ratings

When managers have gathered to calibrate their performance ratings, what does the process look like? To give you a better perspective, we have shared detailed step-wise procedures for performance calibration meetings. For performance calibration to be successful, there are four key steps:

Evaluation

In order to calibrate ratings, you must understand what the ratings are. Performance calibration meetings should not be viewed by managers as a group activity session of rating employees’ performance. Rather, they must complete the reviews themselves before the meeting and present their findings.

It helps managers if they are given prior training or refresher courses on how to evaluate their employees’ performance, based on the performance calibration process.

Calibration

In a performance calibration meeting, managers should discuss the performance appraisals with some tangible examples and reasoning to support their views. 

When managers share drafts of their performance reviews, their peers may have some suggestions for certain points. It is possible that other managers may feel that a rating for a particular employee is too high or too low, causing some additional discussion.

As a result, the manager may realize their overall rating is not based on performance, but rather on arbitrary decisions. This way performance calibration meeting may help a manager to modify the rating after the discussion.

Another factor to consider when calibrating your system is the comparison of current data with historical data for individual departments and for the entire company. By doing so, a manager can better understand an employee’s performance in your organization as a whole.

Avoid forceful implementation:

You should not force or even try to retain a consistent distribution of ratings – quarterly, annually, or departmentally. It is quite common for employees to observe some variation in their performance with time. As a manager, you should always remember that consistent performance measurement is the key, not employees’ consistent outcomes.

Calibration can be carried out once all the information has been collected. The managers should adjust employee evaluations as deemed appropriate to align with a company’s objectives.

Feedback:

Once necessary adjustments have been made, managers can communicate their performance reviews with their employees and engage in direct discussions about those reviews. 

At this point, managers should have more confidence in the validity of their reviews. Similarly, employees should feel the same about the evaluation process.

Also read: How to provide constructive feedback to your employees?
Performance Reviews

Procedure for Kicking-off Performance Calibration Meeting

To get you started with the Performance Calibration meeting, here are the procedures:

Establish a positive tone: Thank participants for attending the Performance Calibration meeting. Make sure participants understand the significance of the meeting and encourage full engagement by stressing the importance of performance calibration.

Ensure confidentiality: Make sure that the meeting’s content, as well as any outcomes, remain confidential. 

Examine rating scales: Before discussing employees’ ratings, take time to review your organization’s scale and system, used to measure performance.

Comparison of performance distribution: You can compare the pattern of performance to the hoped-for performance distribution (decided by managers) or by comparing it to the previous period.

Employee’s performance ratings: In the next section, discuss each employee’s performance ratings. Managers should explain their ratings and explain the rationale for them.

Obtaining opinions: Attendees should be given an opportunity to voice their opinions if they feel an employee’s assessment is biased or if they want to add something to the review.

Adjust ratings as needed: If managers need to change any ratings, they can do so during the meeting.

Express gratitude: Express thankfulness to participants for their time and dedication for making sure employees receive honest and unbiased feedback.

Benefits of Performance Calibration Process

Identifying top performers:

Performance appraisals are designed to distinguish top performers from average or subpar performers and to reward and retain high performers. 

Organization benefits:

For HR and senior management of the company, managers’ performance calibration ratings on employees’ objectives, competencies, and other factors help to set benchmark or traits of a top performer. Furthermore, the ratings can be used not only to determine a pay raise but also to make a decision on promotion and development plans. Thus, with the benchmarks set, organizations can benefit from performance calibration massively as performance becomes quantifiable. 

Performance ratings are more accurate:

By calibrating performance ratings, managers are able to provide more accurate evaluations. Calibration problems can chase high performers away if they are not rewarded for their performance. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure performance ratings are accurate and reliable. The performance calibration process ensures that all employees are rated on the same standards. 

Accountability and transparency:

Managers are held jointly accountable for the performance assessment ratings created for all employees. Managers can gain new insight into employees’ performance by discussing their performance collectively. Discussions among peers could bring transparency in regards to the way managers tend to give ratings – which can be generously or sternly. 

Establishment of a new supportive organizational culture:

Performance calibration is a necessary activity for organizations that have undergone a merger or acquisition. There will need to be an alignment of cultures and performance benchmarks. Merging multiple performance principals through the performance calibration meeting can facilitate the establishment of a new reliable and encouraging organizational culture.

Brings clarity:

During a performance review calibration meeting, if a manager shares and clarifies the rationale for the performance appraisal ratings, it would serve as an example for other managers too. 

Consequently, others managers too will be equipped with supporting reasons for the employees’ ratings, next time a Performance Calibration meeting occurs, eliminating any form of bias. This enables the management team to better understand and reinforce the key performance indicators.

Increases the feelings of equitable treatment:

It is important that employees believe their managers are evaluating them fairly, since compensation, promotion, and succession decisions are based on performance evaluations. Also, organizations may face challenges such as low productivity or a high attrition rate when employees feel they are treated unfairly. Thus, when the performance ratings are accurate and clarified, employees are more likely to perceive the performance appraisal process as acceptable.

Conclusion

Performance Calibration is an indispensable aspect of any performance appraisal cycle. It not only ensures that employees’ performance evaluations are unprejudiced and genuine but also makes the working culture conducive for having a successful workforce. 

Therefore, if your company tracks and measures an employee’s performance manually, you can boost it through an automated evaluation system with Performance Review Calibration measures incorporated within it. This can be achieved through Engagedly’s performance review system, with the parameters of Performance Calibration embedded within it. 

Performance Management Tool

Subscribe To The Engagedly Newsletter